Stalin and National Revolutionary Sports

The foregoing has described, Sun Yat-sen as the representative of the Kuomintang day is no doubt that for joint Soviet (Union), and therefore essential to the Chinese revolution affected the Soviet Union (ITU) is. 1927, to discuss the question of revolution in China, with a total of a hundred and twenty Central held several meetings to make decisions related to more than 700 policy of the Chinese revolution, routes and policy issues --1923 from. Union leader Joseph Stalin even more important is closely watching the development of the Chinese revolution at the moment.

Lenin and Stalin

Stalin on Chinese Revolution had made such assertions, "armed revolution against armed counter-revolution, which is one of the characteristics of the Chinese revolution, one of the advantages of the Chinese revolution." However, Stalin's background was overwhelmed thesis in 1926, he said revolutionary forces led by the Communist Party of China is not the Red Army, but the National Revolutionary Army in the Northern Expedition irresistible force. That Stalin at this time the future of the Chinese revolution lies in the KMT and Chiang Kai-shek who, then Stalin, the Chinese Communist Party's attitude to it?

Stalin believed the Chinese Communists should continue to cooperate with the KMT and the Communists quit the KMT is a huge mistake. At the same time, Stalin left the Communist Party of Communists think it will be difficult to survive independently, but do not believe the Chinese Communist Party led the Chinese democratic revolution can be independently successful. Stalin in Moscow in 1927 Congress had positive words "Chiang Kai-shek may not sympathize with the Chinese revolution, but he led the army in addition to the anti-imperialist accident, he can not have other act." "To take full advantage of them, just squeeze the lemon juice as the squeezed throw away." That Stalin and Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang support of his mind the simplistic assertion that Chiang Kai-shek army would be anti-imperialist. In turn, we can not be understood, Stalin no reason why the Chinese Communists much hope that the latter had not yet mastered or establish a strong armed forces. In summary, under the light of Stalin on Chinese Revolution two conclusions: First, the Chiang Kai-shek would be anti-imperialist; secondly, who has mastered the military, and anyone can lead the Chinese revolution to victory.

Chiang Kai-shek

"Four one two" counter-revolutionary after the coup, Stalin's attitude toward the Chinese Communist Party is very contradictory. First of all, he is still full of distrust of the Communist Party of China, and even once said "We have no real Communist Party in China, or that there is no real Communist Party." Stalin believed the Chinese Communist Party against the Kuomintang to feed in a whole year, enjoying the freedom of work and life, but did not do any work. He attributed the results of the above conditions Communist Party failed to execute instructions of the Comintern. As everyone knows, the Communist Party had strongly opposed withdrawal from the Kuomintang, the Communist Party of Stalin as one requirement is the cooperation with the KMT himself. Secondly, Chiang Kai-shek's betrayal, Stalin was rapidly converted to its embarrassment groundless accusations against the Chinese Communist Party. May 30, 1927, Stalin issued an urgent instruction to the Communist Party of China, asked the latter to immediately proceed with organizing the revolutionary ranks to replace renegade team. This "belated" type of approach does not take into account the actual situation of the Chinese revolution, that is, when the Chinese Communist Party does not have the conditions for the establishment of large-scale armed forces. So why the Communist Party of China armed revolution did not grasp it? Stalin, of course, to bear the responsibility.

After 1926, "Zhongshan Warship" after the incident, Chen had sprouted the idea of ​​establishing their own armed forces to contend with Chiang Kai-shek, but ultimately did not get the recognition and support of the Soviet Union. The following year in February, after the second Shanghai workers armed uprising, the Comintern representative in China, also told the Comintern report, "revolutionary situation in Shanghai is very good, but need the money." However, Moscow not only do not pay attention to this, it demanded the CCP to stop an armed insurrection.

In summary, we can draw the following conclusions: First, Stalin would hope that the Chinese revolution blind faith in Chiang Kai-shek who do not understand the class forces represented by Chiang Kai-shek - the big bourgeoisie. Secondly, after Stalin in the Revolution and the defeat of the revolution did not give the essence of the Communist Party of China, constructive help, but the latter is full of mistrust and accusations. The above two points are traced to expose Stalin's lack of understanding of Chinese revolution and the actual situation in China. As Trotsky said the same after Chiang Kai-shek mutiny, "They betrayed not their class, but our fantasies." Revolution failed, Stalin indication of the CCP it appears that both contradictory, not reality. This in itself is a kind of whitewash, refused to recognize the mistakes of the performance of the Chinese revolution.

Tip: The content of this article is for reference only, please refer to the consultation results of regular hospitals!